|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jun 3, 2002 11:49:19 GMT -5
|
Post by ruppsrunt on Nov 15, 2020 9:51:38 GMT -5
The appropriate documents required to affect that kind of seizure were put in place, signed off on, and it appears there was also US military support in this operation. The US military was not in the lead. But this helps explain why Esper was fired and Miller and Kash Patel were put in place — so that the military would not interfere with the operation in any way. By getting ahold of the server they now are going to have the direct evidence of when they were instructed to stop counting. They will also discover who gave the direction to stop counting and who initiated the algorithm that started switching votes. The CIA was completely excluded from this operation. thespectator.info/2020/11/14/did-the-us-raid-european-software-company-scytl-and-seize-their-servers-in-germany-our-intel-source-says-yes-it-happened/rr |
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Sept 8, 2001 20:59:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Katman on Nov 15, 2020 11:11:10 GMT -5
Nothing can stop what is coming.
|
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Dec 31, 2005 11:35:30 GMT -5
|
Post by Big Worm on Nov 16, 2020 8:49:22 GMT -5
What is coming, exactly?
|
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Sept 8, 2001 20:59:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Katman on Nov 16, 2020 10:41:12 GMT -5
Truth, exposure of criminality. Fraud exposed. |
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Dec 31, 2005 11:35:30 GMT -5
|
Post by Big Worm on Nov 16, 2020 11:19:24 GMT -5
I think that all elections have some element of fraud behind them. There is too much at risk for most elections. I would love to have the light shone on the dark corner of the presidential elections.
For me, I don't want the fraud exposure and then do nothing about it. Nor do I think the end goal of the exposure is to put Trump back in office and continue moving as we have the last 4 years. The purpose of exposure is to correct the issues, and initiate a system that limits the fraudulent behavior.
To be clear, the goal cannot be simply to put Trump back in office and keep Biden from office.
|
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Mar 21, 2019 12:37:12 GMT -5
|
Post by fiddlingone on Nov 16, 2020 12:46:45 GMT -5
I think that all elections have some element of fraud behind them. There is too much at risk for most elections. I would love to have the light shone on the dark corner of the presidential elections. For me, I don't want the fraud exposure and then do nothing about it. Nor do I think the end goal of the exposure is to put Trump back in office and continue moving as we have the last 4 years. The purpose of exposure is to correct the issues, and initiate a system that limits the fraudulent behavior. To be clear, the goal cannot be simply to put Trump back in office and keep Biden from office. IMO the goal is to make sure this past election was/is fair and honest. After that, the goal is to make sure all future elections are fair and honest, though I'm not so sure that we as a nation can agree on what is fair. |
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Sept 8, 2001 20:59:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Katman on Nov 16, 2020 13:34:54 GMT -5
I think that all elections have some element of fraud behind them. There is too much at risk for most elections. I would love to have the light shone on the dark corner of the presidential elections. For me, I don't want the fraud exposure and then do nothing about it. Nor do I think the end goal of the exposure is to put Trump back in office and continue moving as we have the last 4 years. The purpose of exposure is to correct the issues, and initiate a system that limits the fraudulent behavior. To be clear, the goal cannot be simply to put Trump back in office and keep Biden from office. Trump cant be put back in office because he hasn't left office. The election results will be overturned. But yes, once the voting systems are secured again through a total rework of the systems at the state levels, it will help insure that only legal votes with voter ID will be counted, as it should be. Thats where we are headed, voter I.D. |
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jan 9, 2006 11:37:14 GMT -5
|
Post by houstoncat on Nov 16, 2020 14:01:03 GMT -5
While I don't agree with what I think may be worms political leanings (no offense worm)show me the damn hard evidence, if you have it or more to the point if the Presidents lawyers et.al. have it when is the court case? Katman and Runt you have no idea, the time for election certification is getting short. You have to have hard evidence stuff was changed, it may well be there but it hasn't come out yet and I'm not talking the media, I'm talking the Presidents folks. When is the court date, what court?
SCOTUS has no stomach to overturn and election they will Parse any decision to split that off from say state executive making election rules over state legislatures.
You turn election over by proving hard widespread fraud in sufficient amounts in whatever state to change the vote from up to down or vice versa.
I'll say it again I think crap went on no question but other then rhetoric and a few affidavits I see no hard numbers nor a court at any level so far that has seen them.
Show it Katman and stop with your chants and Saul A like verbal/written nonsense. I want elections to be free of fraud and cheating and I want Trump as President but you can't do it without hard damn proof
|
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Dec 31, 2005 11:35:30 GMT -5
|
Post by Big Worm on Nov 16, 2020 14:55:21 GMT -5
I think that all elections have some element of fraud behind them. There is too much at risk for most elections. I would love to have the light shone on the dark corner of the presidential elections. For me, I don't want the fraud exposure and then do nothing about it. Nor do I think the end goal of the exposure is to put Trump back in office and continue moving as we have the last 4 years. The purpose of exposure is to correct the issues, and initiate a system that limits the fraudulent behavior. To be clear, the goal cannot be simply to put Trump back in office and keep Biden from office. IMO the goal is to make sure this past election was/is fair and honest. After that, the goal is to make sure all future elections are fair and honest, though I'm not so sure that we as a nation can agree on what is fair. IMO, this past election was/is as fair as the election in 2016 that put Trump in office. That's not to say Trump was fraudulently elected as President, rather as a way of saying that there are fradulent undertones in every election. No worries, hc. My political leanings are both red and blue. My beliefs are more on the issues/topics themselves rather than a party ideology. While I am a strong proponent of the ACA, I am strongly pro-life. I make for an easy target on very strongly leaning republican message board. |
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Sept 8, 2001 20:59:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Katman on Nov 16, 2020 14:57:26 GMT -5
While I don't agree with what I think may be worms political leanings (no offense worm)show me the damn hard evidence, if you have it or more to the point if the Presidents lawyers et.al. have it when is the court cate? Katman and Runt you have no idea, the time for election certification is getting short. You have to have hard evidence stuff was changed, it may well be there but it hasn't come out yet and I'm not talking the media, I'm talking the Presidents folks. When is the court date, what court? SCOTUS has no stomach to overturn and election they will Parse any decision to split that off from say state executive making election rules over state legislatures. You turn election over by proving hard widespread fraud in sufficient amounts in whatever state to change the vote from up to down or vice versa. I'll say it again I think crap went on no question but other then rhetoric and a few affidavits I see no hard numbers nor a court at any level so far that has seen them. Show it Katman and stop with your chants and Saul A like verbal/written nonsense. I want elections to be free of fraud and cheating and I want Trump as President but you can't do it without hard damn proof Will be filed this week in the supreme court. You wanting to know about proof, you should be hearing plenty over the next month. |
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jan 9, 2006 11:37:14 GMT -5
|
Post by houstoncat on Nov 16, 2020 14:58:11 GMT -5
I truly hope you are right
|
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Sept 8, 2001 20:59:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Katman on Nov 16, 2020 15:53:31 GMT -5
Why wouldn't I be? I just watched Trumps lawyers lay it all out. Why are you missing all this?
Are you still watching MSM?
|
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jan 9, 2006 11:37:14 GMT -5
|
Post by houstoncat on Nov 16, 2020 20:47:12 GMT -5
Why wouldn't I be? I just watched Trumps lawyers lay it all out. Why are you missing all this? Are you still watching MSM? Rhetoric not decided on by court means jack right now no motions made or rejected by any side |
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Sept 8, 2001 20:59:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Katman on Nov 16, 2020 21:15:39 GMT -5
Why wouldn't I be? I just watched Trumps lawyers lay it all out. Why are you missing all this? Are you still watching MSM? Rhetoric not decided on by court means jack right now no motions made or rejected by any side Is that a yes or a no on if you still watch MSM? |
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jan 9, 2006 11:37:14 GMT -5
|
Post by houstoncat on Nov 16, 2020 21:40:30 GMT -5
I never watch the alphabet networks rarely fox. Isthat a yes or a nothat you still psy attention to Q?
|
|
