Became a Dynasty Defender: May 25, 2002 20:20:04 GMT -5
|
Post by fiddling on Jun 21, 2018 17:37:15 GMT -5
Some are saying he did and should never work in the NBA again because of it. Just another reason to not care about the NBA.
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Sept 8, 2001 20:59:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Katman on Jun 21, 2018 19:07:50 GMT -5
So the NBA says if you arent a Socialist/Globalist you cant be in the NBA? Screw the NBA, Im glad I dont watch it.
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Apr 22, 2002 6:40:17 GMT -5
|
Post by Riley on Jun 22, 2018 11:53:44 GMT -5
...never, ever under estimate what a liberal will do or not do to promote their agenda....
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Dec 24, 2008 12:00:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Streeter on Jun 24, 2018 9:31:01 GMT -5
I'm not going to get into over exaggeration on the labeling here ...... I will say it's shitty form when Dems are all for diversity except when it's sonething they disagree with then they demonize it. I may nor agree with gop all the time at lease they aren't hypocrisy driven.
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Feb 7, 2005 20:54:54 GMT -5
|
Post by TheProfessor on Jun 24, 2018 13:19:50 GMT -5
This country is at war with itself. The divide is widening on a daily basis. The rhetoric is as blistering as I can recall, and the anger is explosive. When will open fighting erupt in our streets? I fear it is drawing closer each day.
The liberal/progressives have already chosen to use real bullets at least once in this war. The trumpsters have not yet. However, continue pushing to the flash point, and the retaliation will occur. When that happens, all bets are off.
I have been thinking of our situation as the 2nd American Revolution, but the divide is feeling more akin to the 2nd American Civil War. In the first Civil War, 620,000 soldiers and 50,000 civilians died. That was with bombs, muskets, and bayonettes at a time when the US population was 31.4 million. Today, the weapons are much more lethal, populations are 10 fold higher, and the population densities are much higher in the urban centers.
If this country does not pull back and restore civility, rule of law, and public order, this could get very ugly very fast.
Wake Up America!!!!
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jan 9, 2006 11:37:14 GMT -5
|
Post by houstoncat on Jul 1, 2018 14:10:16 GMT -5
I believe that american is awajke professor on tdsys wedge issue immigration even demos say the rule of law needs following at about 59 %. We have a very vocal very violent progressive left ie socialists that gripe but offer no solutions. Big cities are the issue really they do not belive or ever have believed that anyone outside of the city limits know what is good for them. I belive ii,mm,igration is a loser for them but consevatives must put forth viable and pragmatic solutions the left is not capable of that.
The young lady that won the primary in new york is a prime exaple free everything raise taxes knowing that its fiscally impossible. Just a different lie to gain power. More in that race i do not thnk more then 30000 or so votes were cast out of a possible 250000 or more in the district. Wake up indeed. We are seeing first hand why the framers structured the constitution the way they did.
So much turm,oiil over a possible additional conservative on SCOTUS. Leftist and media claiming a comng loss of “rights”. No such thing will happen. I have to hope that the silent consevatives and independent will step up yet again to prevent socialism from ruining our country.
On another note, Professor one heres some senators who will ask a potential justice how he would vote Rowe v Wade or specific iimmigration determinatons seems to me a true unbiased judge would have personal views but would have to hear the arguments and case law before he let out an opinion. Othewise they would demand he recuse himself because of his stated personal views. Is my thinking correct on that?
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Feb 7, 2005 20:54:54 GMT -5
|
Post by TheProfessor on Jul 1, 2018 20:30:41 GMT -5
I believe that american is awajke professor on tdsys wedge issue immigration even demos say the rule of law needs following at about 59 %. We have a very vocal very violent progressive left ie socialists that gripe but offer no solutions. Big cities are the issue really they do not belive or ever have believed that anyone outside of the city limits know what is good for them. I belive ii,mm,igration is a loser for them but consevatives must put forth viable and pragmatic solutions the left is not capable of that. The young lady that won the primary in new york is a prime exaple free everything raise taxes knowing that its fiscally impossible. Just a different lie to gain power. More in that race i do not thnk more then 30000 or so votes were cast out of a possible 250000 or more in the district. Wake up indeed. We are seeing first hand why the framers structured the constitution the way they did. So much turm,oiil over a possible additional conservative on SCOTUS. Leftist and media claiming a comng loss of “rights”. No such thing will happen. I have to hope that the silent consevatives and independent will step up yet again to prevent socialism from ruining our country. On another note, Professor one heres some senators who will ask a potential justice how he would vote Rowe v Wade or specific iimmigration determinatons seems to me a true unbiased judge would have personal views but would have to hear the arguments and case law before he let out an opinion. Othewise they would demand he recuse himself because of his stated personal views. Is my thinking correct on that? The other day, I saw a liberal Congress Woman say that it is time to take the gloves off because they had always played by the rules, but now the rules are out of play. What baloney! The damn Republicans in Congress have historically refused to engage the enemy (play by the rules) while the lefties have abused procedures and process for decades ever since Robert Bork, and probably before that. As for the proper response by a SCOTUS nominee, i agree that the nominee should never answer questions about how he/she would vote on any issue that could come before the court in the future, including questions about whether Roe v Wade should be reversed or sustained. This is why the nominee's published writings and speeches will be so important, and President Trump would be best served by a nominee who has very little written record that the idiots can spend days picking apart. I am confident that all five of the finalists are extraordinarily well qualified to be SCOTUS Justices. And when all the dust settles in mid September on this process, I believe the Senate will vote to confirm by a very narrow margin that will probably include 2 or 3 democrats in hopes of salvaging their reelection in November with defections by Witch Collins and probably the witch from Alaska. It is just as well that McCain won't vote because he would be a NO vote simply to derail Trump if he could. My opinion is that should this initial nomination come off the rails, the President will wait until after the November election when the Republican margin in the Senate should expand to a working margin sufficient to get the justice approved without any democrat votes.
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Sept 8, 2001 20:59:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Katman on Jul 2, 2018 7:09:33 GMT -5
MAGA
Q
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jan 9, 2006 11:37:14 GMT -5
|
Post by houstoncat on Jul 2, 2018 15:32:51 GMT -5
Thans professor glad to see im not totally off uch questions . These folks are hyper qualified hopefully originaliists ii am sure trumps team will vette the nominee throughly
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Apr 22, 2002 6:40:17 GMT -5
|
Post by Riley on Jul 2, 2018 18:19:46 GMT -5
...never...never ever underestimate what a liberal will do or not do to make sure their agenda is moved forward.....never....
|
|