Became a Dynasty Defender: Dec 24, 2008 12:00:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Streeter on Jan 31, 2019 13:24:38 GMT -5
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jan 9, 2006 11:37:14 GMT -5
|
Post by houstoncat on Feb 5, 2019 18:12:54 GMT -5
Never know Streeter we will see if there is a breakthrough. Im skeptical just because everyone has a different genetics as do the cancers a medicine or treatment that can continually adapt to that and not harm somthing else would be a true revalation
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: May 25, 2002 20:20:04 GMT -5
|
Post by fiddling on Feb 6, 2019 6:27:29 GMT -5
Never know Streeter we will see if there is a breakthrough. Im skeptical just because everyone has a different genetics as do the cancers a medicine or treatment that can continually adapt to that and not harm somthing else would be a true revalation I heard the lead scientist on the radio a few days ago. It is a patient specific treatment with a "cocktail" approach much like aids treatment. They propose to start with more common cancers and add others as they go.
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Sept 8, 2001 20:59:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Katman on Feb 6, 2019 8:11:53 GMT -5
Its already available, very likely.
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Dec 24, 2008 12:00:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Streeter on Feb 6, 2019 15:13:33 GMT -5
Never know Streeter we will see if there is a breakthrough. Im skeptical just because everyone has a different genetics as do the cancers a medicine or treatment that can continually adapt to that and not harm somthing else would be a true revalation I heard the lead scientist on the radio a few days ago. It is a patient specific treatment with a "cocktail" approach much like aids treatment. They propose to start with more common cancers and add others as they go. it may be working too well ........ u know they would be told to make it like hiv drug cocktail that u have to have it every day rest of life an it will cost u 200 a month. Corporate would never miss the chance to bleed people as much at they can.
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: May 25, 2002 20:20:04 GMT -5
|
Post by fiddling on Feb 6, 2019 15:47:23 GMT -5
I heard the lead scientist on the radio a few days ago. It is a patient specific treatment with a "cocktail" approach much like aids treatment. They propose to start with more common cancers and add others as they go. it may be working too well ........ u know they would be told to make it like hiv drug cocktail that u have to have it every day rest of life an it will cost u 200 a month. Corporate would never miss the chance to bleed people as much at they can. That's certainly a possibility, but I see you have conspiracy theories of your own.
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Dec 24, 2008 12:00:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Streeter on Feb 6, 2019 18:25:59 GMT -5
it may be working too well ........ u know they would be told to make it like hiv drug cocktail that u have to have it every day rest of life an it will cost u 200 a month. Corporate would never miss the chance to bleed people as much at they can. That's certainly a possibility, but I see you have conspiracy theories of your own. I just know how evil Republicans...... err I mean Corporations are.
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jan 9, 2006 11:37:14 GMT -5
|
Post by houstoncat on Feb 6, 2019 19:21:06 GMT -5
That's certainly a possibility, but I see you have conspiracy theories of your own. I just know how evil Republicans...... err I mean Corporations are. Assuming this approach is successful and available withholding it from use for mmaking m,oney off of other trermments or to drive cost up is an evil thing yes they should make profit a lot but withholding is wrong
|
|