Became a Dynasty Defender: Jun 3, 2002 11:49:19 GMT -5
|
Post by ruppsrunt on Sept 21, 2020 16:21:37 GMT -5
And--not hurt the TRUMP choice. gop has 53 senators and dumbdem marxists have 47. dumb murkowski and palsycollins say they do not want a senate vote(so they abstain), and female romney is likely to join his other women--so 3 abstain and do as they suggest--they do NOT VOTE prior to the election. This keeps their promise and leaves the dumbdem marxists in a bind. gop still has 50 and marxists still only have 47. TRUMP nominee easily passes and is confirmed. This is the likely scenario that assures another staunch conservative constitutionalist is added to the scotus. Great solution that makes everyone happy--that counts. rr
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jan 9, 2006 11:37:14 GMT -5
|
Post by houstoncat on Sept 21, 2020 17:01:47 GMT -5
Question is do women simply abstain for principle of not confirming or do they say no to a very qualified and deserving jurist and embarasses themselves bear in mind ginsberg was 97-3
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jun 3, 2002 11:49:19 GMT -5
|
Post by ruppsrunt on Sept 21, 2020 18:43:58 GMT -5
I just explained the VOTE. NO hesitation. palsycollins and dumbmurkowski have NEVER said they will vote AGAINST a nominee---just, they will not VOTE!! femaleromney will likely do the same as he squats to pee. 50-47---nominee passes. I think I got a little inside info today. rr
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jan 9, 2006 11:37:14 GMT -5
|
Post by houstoncat on Sept 21, 2020 19:36:46 GMT -5
I just explained the VOTE. NO hesitation. palsycollins and dumbmurkowski have NEVER said they will vote AGAINST a nominee---just, they will not VOTE!! femaleromney will likely do the same as he squats to pee. 50-47---nominee passes. I think I got a little inside info today. rr Ahh you misunderstand you did explain and very well what i was getting at is will they abstain which is the right way to do or will they feel they need to protest the move and deny a very good conservative for scotus by voting no to vex trump. Present is an acceptable way to protest w/o hurting a potentially very good jurist. BTW hope you are right on the inside
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Dec 27, 2006 22:41:35 GMT -5
|
Post by smyrnacat on Sept 21, 2020 19:54:33 GMT -5
Hope you guys are right, but even if the three "women" vote no, it's a 50/50 tie and the tie breaker goes to Pence. This should be a go any way we look at it unless there is another defection from the GOP and they actually vote no.
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jun 3, 2002 11:49:19 GMT -5
|
Post by ruppsrunt on Sept 21, 2020 20:13:40 GMT -5
Hope you guys are right, but even if the three "women" vote no, it's a 50/50 tie and the tie breaker goes to Pence. This should be a go any way we look at it unless there is another defection from the GOP and they actually vote no. the 3 women will ABSTAIN---they will refrain from any vote, as they have said. "We will not support a vote before the new president". So--they will NOT vote at all--ergo, 50-47 advantage. rr
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jan 9, 2006 11:37:14 GMT -5
|
Post by houstoncat on Sept 21, 2020 20:38:40 GMT -5
Hope you guys are right, but even if the three "women" vote no, it's a 50/50 tie and the tie breaker goes to Pence. This should be a go any way we look at it unless there is another defection from the GOP and they actually vote no. the 3 women will ABSTAIN---they will refrain from any vote, as they have said. "We will not support a vote before the new president". So--they will NOT vote at all--ergo, 50-47 advantage. rr I do hope you are right but moosekowski and liberral romney evidently have axes to grind
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jun 3, 2002 11:49:19 GMT -5
|
Post by ruppsrunt on Sept 22, 2020 14:10:07 GMT -5
femaleromney declared to media he will support the scotus nominee if she is conservative. so--femalromney will NOT help the dumbdems this time. As posted yesterday--nominee approval is CERTAIN---with limited debate time for evil dems to turn the hearing into another travesty of lies, deceit and EVIL. scotus will soon have a true conservative added, thus making extorted roberts no longer a lingering dem vote of significance. his waffling liberalism will no longer be an issue. The era of bush libs in control is about to be finished!! rr
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jan 9, 2006 11:37:14 GMT -5
|
Post by houstoncat on Sept 22, 2020 15:09:57 GMT -5
Need to keep presidency and senste. If trump is prez and they try to pack which they wont he will keep nominating constitutionlist must keep senate much tougher
|
|
Became a Dynasty Defender: Jan 9, 2006 11:37:14 GMT -5
|
Post by houstoncat on Sept 22, 2020 19:54:33 GMT -5
Seems two of the girls may vote no. Perhaps mitch can exert a bit of pressure just to vote present. That way they save face for their “principles” and get do not dis a woman whose going to be an influential jurist
|
|